Joy to the World!

December 24, 2009 at 7:24 am | In Theology, Worship | 1 Comment

              On the way home from a worship service one day, the preacher’s son complained that church music was boring.  His father challenged him, “If you think you can do better, then you write a song for us to sing.”  Young Isaac, who had a propensity for rhyme, took on the challenge, and the result so impressed his father that he taught it to the congregation, and they also loved it.  So he wrote a new song for the church every week for the next two years!  Thus began the career of Isaac Watts (1674-1748), often called “The Father of English Hymnody.”  He published hundreds of songs which influenced all English speaking churches for generations.  We still sing some of them in churches today.  Many of Watts hymns present his Puritan, Reformed theology in profound or memorable ways.

            Possibly Isaac Watts’ best known song today is “Joy to the World.”  The lyrics of the later, probably lesser-known, verses present great theological thoughts for Christmas.  Notice the Reformed themes of glory, sin and grace:

No more let sins and sorrows grow,
Nor thorns infest the ground;
He comes to make His blessings flow
Far as the curse is found,
Far as the curse is found,
Far as, far as, the curse is found.

He rules the world with truth and grace,
And makes the nations prove
The glories of His righteousness,
And wonders of His love,
And wonders of His love,
And wonders, wonders, of His love.

Have a glorious, Christ-filled Christmas!

Making the Gospel More Attractive

December 5, 2009 at 12:24 pm | In Devotional thoughts, Theology | 1 Comment

            In Titus 2:9-10 Paul says we should make the teaching about God our Savior attractive.  That comment is in an interesting context.  So often, in our world, making the teaching about God more attractive means either changing the content of the message or changing the methods used to present that content.

            The first of those two means I strongly oppose.  In fact, this book of Titus is all about sound doctrine; the theme verse is 2:1 – “speak the things which are fitting for sound doctrine.”  If we change the content of the gospel, it really isn’t any gospel (i.e. good news) at all.  This is seen especially in the matter of sin.  Too many presentations of the “gospel” water down the fact that we are utterly sinful, but without establishing the matter of our sinfulness, the necessity of the cross is done away with, and Jesus becomes just a friend or helper in our spiritual journeys or a guide who helps reveal God to us.  But the good news of the gospel is that Jesus died for our sins.  Thus watering down our sin, to make the gospel more attractive, is not presenting the gospel at all.

            The second way Christians make the gospel more attractive is by changing the methods we use to present it.  I am in agreement with doing this, as long as it is the gospel we present and as long as we don’t violate scriptural principle with our new methods.  However, in Titus, it is not the methods that Paul is talking about when he says to make the gospel more attractive; it is character.  Notice the entire sentence of that phrase: “Teach slaves to be subject to their masters in everything, to try to please them, not to talk back to them, and not to steal from them, but to show that they can be fully trusted, so that in every way they will make the teaching about God our Savior attractive.”  What makes the teaching of God our Savior attractive is the character of the slave toward his master; not back talking, not stealing, pleasing his master with his work, and proving trustworthy.

            Maybe we should concentrate more on our godly character than on changing our methods of presenting the gospel.  Maybe that concentration would make for more effective evangelism in the long term.

My Chosen Instrument

October 8, 2009 at 9:29 am | In It's All About God, Theology | Leave a Comment

            This week I gave a bold sermon on Calvinism.  I address these matters often, but since many lay people are turned off by the name, I usually take a more subtle approach by pointing out the depth of our sin or the sovereignty of God, by telling the congregation “it’s all about God,” or by showing how He is the subject of most of the verbs, etc.  But when I came across the emphatic phrase, “he is my chosen instrument,” in Acts 9:15, especially after Luke’s emphasis on Saul’s evil, I had to address it more plainly.  I feared how some of our Arminian attenders might respond.  But the responses from the ones who talked to me were far more positive than I imagined.

          I read the following quote, from Michael Horton in Modern Reformation, as an illustration: 

          The doctrine of election, like many other hard theological topics, is taboo in many Christian churches today.  Instead of discussing the central doctrines of our faith, many only want to talk about marriage, child rearing, church organization, or spiritual warfare.  These “practical” subjects are considered to be more important than controversial doctrinal issues that only serve to divide our churches.  But the Apostle Paul in his letter to the Ephesians begins his teaching of marriage, child rearing, church organization and spiritual warfare with a no-holds-barred discussion of God’s sovereign election of individuals to salvation in Christ.  A subject that many Christians will avoid by moving to the other side of the room is the foundation for all of Paul’s subsequent instruction on the day-to-day life of the saints.

Then I read Ephesians in my devotions this week.  I was tickled by chapter four because I think of the first three chapters of Ephesians as being the “controversial doctrinal issues,” and the last three as being the “practical matters.”  But what I noticed was the number of times these “doctrinal issues” are referenced in the fourth chapter.  Paul begins with “I urge you to live a life worthy of the calling you have received” and “There is one body and one Spirit – just as you were called to one hope when you were called.” (4:1, 4)  Then the chapter ends with these reminders, “Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, with whom you were sealed for the day of redemption,” and “Be kind and compassionate to one another, forgiving each other, just as in Christ God forgave you.” (4:30, 32) 

            It is our calling by God, our sealing by the Holy Spirit, and our forgiveness in Christ that is the basis for practical matters in the church.  The practical matters are an outworking of the doctrinal matters, or, as Horton put it, “the foundation of all Paul’s subsequent instruction on the day-to-day life of the saints.”  If we want to get our day-to-day life in order, then we must begin with getting our theology in order.

You can hear the message on line at this link

Two Songs of Grace

September 29, 2009 at 9:01 am | In God's Love, Theology, Worship | Leave a Comment

         Here are some links Stephen Pegler (http://peglermusings.blogspot.com) sent me with some videos of hymns that I didn’t know.  These are powerful, amazing songs of grace.  The first is an older hymn; in the video it is sung by the Stoneleigh Band, led by Stewart Townend — co-author of my all-time favorite “In Christ Alone” and author of “How Deep the Father’s Love for Us.”  This is a song as powerful as those.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_GB_N_79-Q

The words were written in 1863 by Charitie Bancroft.  I love the second verse, since we all face the temptation to despair and the “guilt within.”

Before the throne of God above
I have a strong and perfect plea.
A great high Priest whose Name is Love
Who ever lives and pleads for me.
My name is graven on His hands,
My name is written on His heart.
I know that while in Heaven He stands
No tongue can bid me thence depart.

When Satan tempts me to despair
And tells me of the guilt within,
Upward I look and see Him there
Who made an end of all my sin.
Because the sinless Savior died
My sinful soul is counted free.
For God the just is satisfied
To look on Him and pardon me.

Behold Him there the risen Lamb,
My perfect spotless righteousness,
The great unchangeable I AM,
The King of glory and of grace,
One in Himself I cannot die.
My soul is purchased by His blood,
My life is hid with Christ on high,
With Christ my Savior and my God!

 

          The second song is a newer one called “The Power of the Cross.”  In the video, it is sung by Kristyn Getty.  Her husband Keith is the other co-author of “In Christ Alone” and, I believe, is playing the piano.  This is also a song he wrote.  Their ministry is to introduce the modern church to new hymns with great theological depth.  Most of their words are amazing.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ms-gxEOtLA&feature=related

The words can be found on the Getty’s site:  http://www.gettymusic.com/hymns.aspx

          Speaking of Keith and Kristyn Getty, here is their version of “In Christ Alone.”  I love her Irish accent and the way they present the third verse.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZuIyrwSqHY&feature=related

 Happy listening!  Thanks Stephen!

Sola Fida in Acts

September 16, 2009 at 11:21 am | In False teaching, Theology | Leave a Comment

            I have written that Acts 2:38 doesn’t teach baptism as necessary for salvation.  Now I want to demonstrate that all of Acts argues for salvation by grace alone through faith alone.  I will use faith and repentance in this article interchangeably, though they are not exactly the same thing.  Repentance is turning away from something one used to trust; faith is turning to something else and putting one’s trust there.  Genuine, biblical faith, faith that results in salvation, involves both aspects. It is not real saving faith in Jesus, if someone hasn’t turned completely away from his previous trusts.  To be saved one must trust Jesus alone; he cannot just add Jesus to his other lifelines.  So when the Bible talks about faith necessary for salvation or repentance necessary for salvation, it may be emphasizing one aspect of genuine faith over another, but it is not giving two completely different requirements.

            After Pentecost, Peter’s very next sermon was about the healing of the lame man in the temple and includes the words “It is Jesus’ name and the faith that comes through him that has given this complete healing.”  Of course that doesn’t say anything about salvation, but it does say something about the importance of faith in Jesus.  However, plenty of other passages offer support to this argument as well.  Peter speaks to the Sanhedrin and offers this conclusion, “God exalted (Jesus) to his own right hand as Prince and Savior that he might give repentance and forgiveness of sins to Israel.” (5:31)  There is no mention of anything connected to forgiveness other than repentance.  Then in Peter’s sermon to Cornelius and his family, Peter spells out the requirements for these Gentiles; “everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of sins through his name.” (10:43)  It is interesting that the Holy Spirit came into their lives right at that moment.  The audience had been eagerly waiting about four days to hear what Peter would say, and as soon as he said “believe,” they did.  Baptism wasn’t necessary, though it followed immediately after.  These first Gentile believers were saved before they were baptized, and before they did anything else for that matter!  When Peter was questioned about spending time with Gentiles, he told his story, and “when they heard this, they had no further objections and praised God saying, ‘So then, God has granted even the Gentiles repentance unto life.’” (11:18)

            We see the same teaching in the sermons of Paul.  His first one parallels Peter’s first in many ways.  But his application to this mostly Jewish audience is “Therefore, my brothers, I want you to know that through Jesus the forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you.  Through him everyone who believes is justified from everything you could not be justified from by the Law of Moses.” (13:38-39)  Again there is no mention of any requirement on our part but faith.  When the Philippian jailer asked point blank, “What must I do to be saved?”  Paul gave the direct answer, “Believe on the Lord Jesus and you will be saved.” (16:29-31)  His farewell address to the Ephesian elders states, “I have declared to both Jews and Greeks that they must turn to God in repentance and have faith in our Lord Jesus.”  (20:21; see also 26:15-18)

            However, I believe the key passage in this matter is found in Acts 15.  The Apostles and elders of the Jerusalem church met to discuss the matter of the Gentile believers coming into the church in huge numbers.  They were particularly interested in the question of circumcision – whether or not the Gentiles had to be circumcised to be saved – but their conclusion impacts our question as well.  Peter reminded the Council of his dream from God and of Cornelius’ salvation.   Then he concludes, “He made no distinction between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith.   .  .  .  we believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.” (15:9-11)  The conclusion of the question about circumcision was that God saves by his grace through faith – and nothing else.

It’s All About God — Acts edition

September 1, 2009 at 2:36 pm | In It's All About God, Theology | Leave a Comment

            The reformed position on grace and election doesn’t come from Paul alone, as some might say it is a distorted understanding of Paul’s epistles; rather it comes from an understanding of the scriptures as a whole.  Luke, who actually wrote more pages of the New Testament than Paul, brings this teaching to us in many ways through the book of Acts.  Here are some examples:

            When the apostles decided to replace Judas, they prayed that God would show to them the one he had already chosen for that ministry (1:24).  Peter viewed himself and the other apostles that way also, as he said to Cornelius, “God raised him from the dead on the third day and caused him to be seen – not by all the people, but by witnesses whom God had already chosen – by us who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead.” (10:40-41)  That shouldn’t surprise us, because throughout these early chapters, the apostles understood, finally, that Jesus’ death was God’s plan predetermined from the beginning.  They say things like, “this man was handed over to you by God’s set purpose and foreknowledge;” “this is how God fulfilled what he had foretold though the prophets, saying that his Christ would suffer;” and “they did what your power and will had decided beforehand should happen.” (2:23; 3:18; 4:28)

            In the beginning of his famous Pentecost sermon, Peter quotes from Amos, including the words “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.” (2:21)  But he ends his sermon with “Repent and be baptized  .  .  .  and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.  .  .  .  This promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off – for all whom the Lord our God will call.” (2:38-39)  Did you notice the surprise turn around?  The promise to call on the Lord is for all whom he will call.  It seems to be God’s initiative.  The upshot of this whole matter was “the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.”  Again, it’s his initiative.

            When Peter spoke to the people who had witnessed the healing of the cripple in the temple, possibly just a few days later, he included these words, “By faith in the name of Jesus, this man whom you see and know was made strong.  It is Jesus’ name and the faith that comes through him that has given this complete healing.” (3:16)  Yes, he was healed by his faith in Jesus, but that faith came through Jesus.  Even the faith to believe was a gift of God’s grace!  By the way, that is the correct grammatical understanding of Ephesians 2:8-9 – “by grace you have been saved through faith, and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God” – “it” in the passage refers to faith, not salvation.  We don’t generate our own faith, it comes from God.  That’s why the believers in Jerusalem heard the story of Cornelius and praised God saying, “So then God has granted even the Gentiles repentance unto life.” (11:17)  And the believers in Antioch rejoiced that God “had opened a door of faith to the Gentiles.”  (14:27)  In each case God is the initiator.

            On Paul’s first missionary journey, Luke would say of those in Pisidian Antioch, “all who were appointed for eternal life believed.” (13:48 – a phrase for which I can’t imagine any Arminian response)  And on the second journey, when Paul came to this hemisphere, the first western convert was Lydia, a business woman in Philippi.  Luke tells us “the Lord opened her heart to respond to Paul’s message.” (16:14)  While Paul was in Corinth, the Lord said to him, “Do not be afraid; keep on speaking,  .  .  .  because I have many people in this city,” (18:10) so he stayed there a year and a half.

            Finally, who could ever say that Paul decided on his own to believe in Jesus?  He was hell-bent on destroying the followers of Jesus, yet he was God’s chosen instrument to take the Gospel to the Gentiles, even before his conversion (9:15; 22:10; 22:14; 26:16-18; see also Galatians 1:13-17).  Luke shows us, beyond any doubt, that salvation is all about God; it is his grace and his initiative that saved Paul; it is his grace and his initiative that saves us.

Phantoms and Figments can’t Eat!

August 24, 2009 at 3:44 pm | In Devotional thoughts, Theology | Leave a Comment

            I’ve spent a lot of time in Acts recently.  My most recent Sunday morning class was a video overview of the book; I’m preaching through Acts; just a few weeks ago I read through it on my devotion reading schedule.  I’ve enjoyed it so much that I decided to read through it again while on my recent vacation.  Here’s one phrase that stood out to me though I hadn’t thought about it before.  When Jesus gave his apostles instructions to wait for the Spirit in Jerusalem, he was eating with them (1:4).  The book’s author, Luke, tells us this detail right after saying “he showed himself to these men and gave many convincing proofs that he was alive.”  In the book of Luke, we’re told that, when the disciples did not believe he was alive, only a ghost or a phantom, Jesus asked them for something to eat.  Though none of the other gospel writers mention Jesus eating anything after the resurrection (John 21 may imply he did), Luke, the physician, mentions it twice.  In other words, one of the convincing proofs that Jesus was alive was his ability to eat solid food.  Phantoms and figments of imagination can’t do that.  The eleven were so convinced of Jesus’ resurrection that they were later willing to die for their testimonies to the fact.  They were certain Jesus was alive because they’d been with him, they’d seen him, and they’d even eaten with him.  Jesus is alive!

Transforming Grace

July 29, 2009 at 9:11 am | In Books, Theology | Leave a Comment

         For Christmas a year and a half ago, my sister gave me a copy of Jerry Bridges Transforming Grace, Living Confidently in God’s Unfailing Love, and I’ve finally gotten around to reading it.  I’m about half way through, and so far it has been a great read.  Bridges main theme is that, as Christians, we often believe that salvation is by grace, but that living the Christian life is on our own merits.  He counters with the biblical truth that all of the Christian life, from new birth to heaven is by grace.  Here are a few quotes to give you a feel for the book:

         In a section talking about our spiritual bankruptcy before God, “I think most of us actually declared temporary bankruptcy.  Having trusted in Christ alone for our salvation, we have subtly and unconsciously reverted to a works relationship with God in our Christian lives.  We recognize that even our best efforts cannot get us to Heaven, but we do think they earn us God’s blessings in our daily lives.” (p.15)

         “Here is a spiritual principle regarding the grace of God: To the extent you are clinging to any vestiges of self-righteousness or are putting any confidence in your own spiritual attainments, to that degree you are not living by the grace of God in your life.  This principle applies both in salvation and in living the Christian life.” (p.35)

         After quoting R.C. Sproul on the difficulty of relying totally on God’s grace, Bridges adds, “Not only do we think we must pay our own way, at least to some degree, we subtly insist on paying our own way.  As Dr. Sproul said, ‘Grace is for other people – for beggars,’ but not for us.” (p.63 – his emphasis)

         And finally, “Our good works are not truly good unless they are motivated by a love for God and a desire to glorify him.  But we cannot have such a God-ward motivation if we think we must earn God’s favor by our obedience, or if we fear we may forfeit God’s favor by our disobedience.” (p.86)

         Don’t read this book if you don’t want to be convinced of the Reformed teaching on sin and grace; but do read this book if you want to know biblical truth put into applicable terms that encourage the reader.

For the Sake of the Elect

July 24, 2009 at 8:03 am | In Eschatology, Theology | Leave a Comment

          I have written some in the past about my pilgrimage from Dispensational pre-millennium, pre-tribulation theology to Historic pre-millennium, post-tribulation theology.  Here is another thought from Matthew 24.  Once before, I blogged on this chapter, and it’s parallel in Mark 13.  In both chapters Jesus describes what has to be the Great Tribulation, then he adds what will happen “immediately after those days,” including, “he will send his angels with a loud trumpet to gather his elect from the four winds.” (Mt 24:29-31; Mk 13:24-27)  Today I noticed that in the midst that description of the Great Tribulation, Jesus says “There will great distress, unequaled from the beginning of time until now – and never to be equaled again.  If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect, they will be cut short.” (Mt 24:21-22; see also Mk 13:19-20)

          What could Jesus possibly mean by “for the sake of the elect?”  There are three possibilities: First, he could mean the elect have been raptured and are all with him, and he shortens the Tribulation for them. But that is senseless; there is no reason to shorten the pains of others for the sake of those who suffer nothing.  Second, he could mean those who come to Jesus during the Great Tribulation.  This is the standard Dispensational explanation, as I remember it.  But the biblical indications are that people on earth during the Great Tribulation will curse God rather than turn to him (see Rev 9:20-21; 16:9, 11, 21).  The third possible understanding of Jesus’ words is also the simplest and best understanding – the elect are still on earth during the Tribulation.  They will be gathered from the earth immediately after it, and for their sake God will end it.

Our Great God and Savior

June 18, 2009 at 5:36 pm | In English Bible Translations, False teaching, Theology | Leave a Comment

                Who’s the savior in Titus?  The OT prophet proclaims “I, even I, am the LORD (Yahweh), and apart from me there is no savior.” (Isaiah 43:11)  When Paul wrote this letter to Titus, he would have had an understanding that there was no savior other than Yahweh God.  Yet once in each chapter he applies the title to God and to Jesus.  Note the introduction of the book:  God “brought his word to light through the preaching entrusted to me by the command of God our Savior.”  And just one line later, “Grace and peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Savior.” (1:3-4)  Then in the second chapter, slaves should be subject to their masters, so that “in every way they will make the teaching about God our Savior attractive.”  And just a few sentences later, “we wait for the blessed hope – the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.” (2:10-13)  And finally in the third chapter, Paul puts in this marvelous statement about grace:  “When the kindness and love of God our Savior appeared, he saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy.  He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us generously through Jesus Christ our Savior.” (3:4-6)

                Could there be a stronger statement of the deity of Jesus?  God is our savior; Jesus is our savior; and each said three times.  In fact, Jesus is our great God and savior!  Paul wasn’t confused; he knew exactly what he was saying, and only the Trinity doctrine explains it without contradiction.  By the way, with this line of reasoning, one can prove the deity of Jesus even in the New World Translation of the Jehovah’s Witnesses – a bible translation (not a Bible!) which goes to great length to remove any reference to Jesus’ diety.  Though they change the wording of “our great God and savior,” the argument still holds.  This is such a compelling statement of deity that even that translation couldn’t get it out!

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.